The
evolutionary history of life and the
origin of life are fields of ongoing geological and biological research. Although it isn't necessary to understand the origin of life on earth to accept evolution by natural selection, the origin of life and its evolutionary history can help shed light on evolutionary processes. The current
scientific consensus is that the complex
biochemistry that makes up life came from simpler chemical reactions, but it's unclear how this occurred. Not much is certain about the earliest developments in life, the structure of the first living things, or the identity and nature of any
last universal common ancestor or ancestral gene pool. Consequently, there's no scientific consensus on how life began, but proposals include self-replicating molecules such as
RNA, and the assembly of simple cells.
The first simple, sea dwelling organic structures appeared about 3,400 million years ago. It is considered that they may have formed when certain chemical (organic) molecules joined together.
Prokaryotes, single-celled micro-organisms like blue green algae, were able to photosynthesize and produce
oxygen. Around thousand million years later, sufficient oxygen had built up in the
atmosphere and hence it allow multicellular organisms to proliferate in the Precambrian seas. Soft-bodied jellyfish, corals, and sea worms flourished about 700 million years ago. Trilobites, the first animals with hard body frames, developed during the Cambrian period. About 363 million years ago amphibians came into existence. It was only after the appearance of reptiles that were independent of water.
Early signs of life
The details of the origin of life are unknown, though the broad principles have been established. It has been proposed that life, or at least organic components, may have arrived on
Earth from space (see
Panspermia), while others argue that terrestrial origins are more probable. The mechanisms by which life would initially arise are nevertheless held to be similar.
The timing of the origin of life is highly speculative—perhaps it arose around four billion years ago.
Somehow, in the energetic chemistry of early Earth, a molecule (or even something else) gained the ability to make copies of itself—the replicator. The nature of this molecule is unknown, its function having long since been superseded by life’s current replicator,
DNA. In making copies of itself, the replicator didn't always perform accurately; some copies contained an error. If the change destroyed the copying ability of the molecule, there could be no more copies, and the line would die out. On the other hand, a few rare changes might make the molecule replicate faster or better; those strains would become more numerous and successful. As choice raw materials (food) became depleted, strains which could exploit different materials, or perhaps halt the progress of other strains and steal their resources, became more numerous.
Several different models have been proposed explaining how a replicator might have developed. Different replicators have been posited, including organic chemicals such as modern proteins, nucleic acids,
phospholipids,
crystals, or even quantum systems.
There is currently no method of determining which of these models, if any, closely fits the origin of
life on Earth. One of the older theories, and one which has been worked out in some detail, will serve as an example of how this might occur.
The high energy from volcanoes,
lightning, and
ultraviolet radiation could help drive chemical reactions producing more complex molecules from simple compounds such as
methane and
ammonia. Among these were many of the relatively simple
organic compounds that are the building blocks of life. As the amount of this “organic soup” increased, different molecules reacted with one another. Sometimes more complex molecules would result—perhaps
clay provided a framework to collect and concentrate organic material. The presence of certain molecules could
speed up a chemical reaction. All this continued for a very long time, with reactions occurring more or less at random, until by chance there arose a new molecule: the
replicator. This had the bizarre property of promoting the chemical reactions which produced a copy of itself, and
evolution began properly.
Other theories posit a different replicator. In any case, DNA took over the function of the replicator at some point; all known life (with the exception of some viruses and
prions) use DNA as their replicator, in an almost identical manner (see
genetic code).
The first simple, sea dwelling organic structures appeared about 3,400 million years ago. It is considered that they may have formed when certain chemical (organic) molecules joined together.
Prokaryotes, single-celled micro-organisms like blue green algae, were able to photosynthesize and produce
oxygen. Around thousand million years later, sufficient oxygen had built up in the
atmosphere and hence it allow multicellular organisms to proliferate in the Precambrian seas.
Common descent
All
organisms on
Earth are descended from a common ancestor or ancestral gene pool. Current species are a stage in the process of evolution, with their diversity the product of a long series of speciation and extinction events. The
common descent of organisms was first deduced from four simple facts about organisms: Firstly, they've geographic distributions that can't be explained by local adaptation. Secondly, the diversity of life isn't a set of completely unique organisms, but organisms that share morphological similarities. Thirdly, vestigial traits with no clear purpose resemble functional ancestral traits, and finally, that organisms can be classified using these similarities into a hierarchy of nested groups.
Past species have also left records of their evolutionary history.
Fossils, along with the comparative anatomy of present-day organisms, constitute the morphological, or anatomical, record. By comparing the anatomies of both modern and extinct species, paleontologists can infer the lineages of those species. However, this approach is most successful for organisms that had hard body parts, such as shells, bones or teeth. Furthermore, as prokaryotes such as
bacteria and
archaea share a limited set of common morphologies, their fossils don't provide information on their ancestry.
More recently, evidence for common descent has come from the study of
biochemical similarities between organisms. For example, all living cells use the same
nucleic acids and
amino acids. The development of
molecular genetics has revealed the record of evolution left in organisms'
genomes; dating when species diverged through the
molecular clock produced by mutations. For example, these DNA sequence comparisons have revealed the close genetic similarity between
humans and
chimpanzees and shed light on when the common ancestor of these species existed.
Evolution of life
Despite the uncertainty on how life began, it's clear that
prokaryotes were the first organisms to inhabit Earth, approximately three to four billion years ago. No obvious changes in
morphology or cellular organization occurred in these organisms over the next few billion years.
The
eukaryotes were the next major innovation in evolution. These came from ancient bacteria being engulfed by the ancestors of eukaryotic cells, in an cooperative association called
endosymbiosis. The engulfed bacteria and the host cell then underwent co-evolution, with the bacteria evolving into either
mitochondria or
hydrogenosomes. An independent second engulfment of
cyanobacterial-like organisms led to the formation of
chloroplasts in algae and plants.
As these early eukaryotes and prokaryotes were microscopic, most of the history of life describes simple microorganisms. It is only about a billion years ago in the
Ediacaran period that complex multicellular organisms began to appear in the oceans. The
evolution of multicellularity occurred in multiple independent events, in organisms as diverse as
sponges,
brown algae,
cyanobacteria,
slime moulds and
myxobacteria.
Soon after the emergence of these first multicellular organisms, a remarkable amount of biological diversity appeared over approximately 10 million years, in an event called the
Cambrian explosion. Here, the majority of
types of modern animals evolved, as well as unique lineages that subsequently became extinct. Various triggers for the Cambrian explosion have been proposed, including the accumulation of
oxygen in the
atmosphere from
photosynthesis. About 500 million years ago,
plants and
fungi colonized the land, and were soon followed by
arthropods and other animals.
Amphibians first appeared around 300 million years ago, followed by early
amniotes, then
mammals around 200 million years ago and
birds around 100 million years ago (both from "
reptile"-like lineages).
The earliest cells had to form and exist in anoxic conditions. They were probably chemosynthetic. A quite diverse collection of soft-bodied forms is known from a variety of locations worldwide between 542 and 600 Ma. These are referred to as
Ediacaran or Vendian biota. Hard-shelled creatures appeared toward the end of that timespan.
A very diverse collection of forms appeared around 544 Ma, starting in the latest Precambrian with a poorly understood
small shelly fauna and ending in the very early Cambrian with a very diverse, and quite modern
Burgess fauna, the rapid radiation of forms called the
Cambrian explosion of life.
Life during Phanerozoic
Paleozoic life
The Paleozoic spanned from roughly 542
mya to roughly 251 mya (
ICS 2004).
The Paleozoic covers the time from the first appearance of abundant, hard-shelled
fossils to the time when the
continents were beginning to be dominated by large, relatively sophisticated reptiles and relatively modern
plants. The lower (oldest) boundary was classically set at the first appearance of creatures known as
trilobites and
archeocyathids. The upper (youngest) boundary is set at a major
extinction event 300 million years later, known as the
Permian extinction. Modern practice sets the older boundary at the first appearance of a distinctive
trace fossil called
Trichophycus pedum.
At the start of the era, life was confined to
Ediacaran fauna.
There is some evidence that simple life may already have invaded the land at the start of the Paleozoic, but substantial plants and animals didn't take to the land until the Silurian and didn't thrive until the Devonian. Although primitive
vertebrates are known near the start of the Paleozoic, animal forms were dominated by
invertebrates until the mid-Paleozoic.
Fish populations exploded in the Devonian. During the late Paleozoic, great
forests of primitive plants thrived on land forming the great
coal beds of
Europe and eastern North America. By the end of the era, the first large, sophisticated reptiles and the first modern plants (
conifers) had developed.
Mesozoic life
The Mesozoic extended roughly from 251
Ma to 65 Ma (
ICS 2004).
The extinction of nearly all animal species at the end of the
Permian period allowed for the
radiation of many new lifeforms. In particular, the extinction of the large
herbivorous and
carnivorous dinocephalia left those
ecological niches empty. Some were filled by the surviving
cynodonts and
dicynodonts, the latter of which subsequently became extinct.
Animal life during the Mesozoic was dominated, however, by large
archosaurian
reptiles that appeared a few million years after the Permian extinction:
dinosaurs,
pterosaurs, and aquatic reptiles such as
ichthyosaurs,
plesiosaurs, and
mosasaurs.
The climatic changes of the late Jurassic and Cretaceous provided for further adaptive radiation. The Jurassic was the height of archosaur diversity, and the first
birds and
placental mammals also appeared.
Angiosperms radiated sometime in the early Cretaceous, first in the
tropics, but the even temperature gradient allowed them to spread toward the poles throughout the period. By the end of the Cretaceous, angiosperms dominated tree floras in many areas, although some evidence suggests that
biomass was still dominated by
cycad and
ferns until after the KT extinction.
Some have argued that
insects diversified with angiosperms because insect
anatomy, especially the
mouth parts, seems particularly well-suited for flowering plants. However, all major insect mouth parts preceded angiosperms and insect diversification actually slowed when they arrived, so their anatomy originally must have been suited for some other purpose.
As the temperatures in the seas increased, the larger animals of the early Mesozoic gradually began to disappear while smaller animals of all kinds, including
lizards,
snakes, and perhaps the ancestor
mammals to
primates, evolved. The KT extinction exacerbated this trend. The large archosaurs became extinct, while birds and mammals thrived, as they do today.
Cenozoic life
The Cenozoic era covers the 65.5 million years since the
Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event.
The Cenozoic is the
age of new life. During this era, mammals diverged from a few small, simple, generalized forms into a diverse collection of terrestrial, marine, and flying animals.
As the
dinosaurs perished at the end of the
Cretaceous period, the
mammals took center stage. The mammals are the largest land animals of the Era, as the dinosaurs had been during the Mesozoic. The Cenozoic is just as much the age of
savannas, or the age of co-dependent
flowering plants and insects.
Birds also evolved substantially in the Cenozoic.
Monte Bolca is an important
lagerstätte near
Verona,
Italy, containing excellently preserved fish and other fossils of
Eocene age.
Major geological extinction events
Cambrian explosion
The Cambrian explosion (542–530
Ma) describes the profound diversification in life on Earth. Prior to around, organisms were on the whole simple, comprising of individual cells occasionally organised into colonies. Over the subsequent 70–80 million years, evolution would accelerate by an order of magnitude, and the diversity of life would begin to resemble today's.
The fossil record provides us with a few cases of exceptional preservation around the end of this explosion, with famous units such as the
Burgess shale offering a glimpse into a bustling yet strikingly different world, in stark contrast to the microbe-dominated seas of just 80 million years before.
The Cambrian explosion has generated extensive scientific debate. The seemingly rapid appearance of fossils in the "Primordial Strata" was noted as early as the mid 19th century;
Charles Darwin saw it as one of the principal objections that could be lodged against his theory of
evolution by
natural selection.
The Cambrian explosion has proven difficult to study, partly because of the problems involved in matching up rocks of the same age across disparate
continents. It should be borne in mind that absolute
radiometric dates for much of the Cambrian, obtained by detailed analysis of radioactive elements contained within rocks, have only rather recently become available and that, especially for the Lower Cambrian, detailed
biostratigraphic correlation—using widespread but short-lived species to match the ages of rocks—remains rather, particularly around the internationally-defined
Precambrian/
Cambrian boundary section in
Newfoundland. Dating of important boundaries, and description of faunal successions, should thus be regarded with some degree of caution until better data become available.
Ordovician-Silurian extinction events
The extinctions occurred approximately 444–447 million years ago and mark the boundary between the
Ordovician and the following
Silurian Periods. During this extinction event, which may have been composed of several distinct closely spaced events, there were several marked changes in biologically responsive
carbon and
oxygen isotopes, which may indicate separate events or particular phases within one event.
At that time most complex
multicellular organisms lived in the sea, and around 100 marine
families became extinct, covering about 49 percent of
genera of
fauna (a more reliable estimate than species). The
brachiopods and
bryozoans were decimated, along with many of the
trilobite,
conodont and
graptolite families.
Statistical analysis of marine losses at this time suggests that the decrease in diversity was caused more by a sharp increase in extinctions than by a decrease in
speciation.
Permian-Triassic extinction event
The Permian-Triassic (P-Tr) extinction event, sometimes informally called the
Great Dying, was an
extinction event that occurred (mya), forming the boundary between the
Permian and
Triassic geologic periods. It was the Earth's most severe extinction event, with up to 96 percent of all
marine species and 70 percent of
terrestrial vertebrate species becoming
extinct.
The extinction rate of marine organisms was catastrophic;
it is harder to produce such detailed statistics for land, river, swamp and lake environments because good Permian-Triassic rock sequences from terrestrial environments are extremely rare (the
Karoo basin is by far the best).
Even so, there's enough evidence to indicate that:
Late Devonian extinction
The Devonian extinction crisis primarily affected the marine community, and selectively affected shallow warm-water organisms rather than cool-water organisms. The most important group to be affected by this extinction event were the reef-builders of the great Devonian reef-systems, including the
stromatoporoids, and the
rugose and
tabulate corals. The reef system collapse was so severe that major reef-building (effected by new families of carbonate-excreting organisms, the modern scleractinian corals) didn't recover until the Mesozoic era.
The late Devonian crash in
biodiversity was more drastic than the familiar extinction event that closed the
Cretaceous: a recent survey (McGhee 1996) estimates that 22 percent of all the
families of marine animals (largely
invertebrates) were eliminated, the category of families offering a broad range of real structural diversity. Some 57 percent of the
genera went extinct, and—the estimate most likely to be adjusted—at least 75 percent of the species didn't survive into the following
Carboniferous. The estimates of species loss depend on surveys of marine taxa that are perhaps not well enough known to assess their true rate of losses, and for the Devonian it isn't easy to allow for possible effects of differential preservation and
sampling biases. Amongst the severely affected marine groups were the
brachiopods,
trilobites,
ammonites,
conodonts, and
acritarchs, as well as
jawless fish, and all
placoderms. Freshwater species, including our
tetrapod ancestors, were less affected.
Triassic-Jurassic extinction event
The Triassic-Jurassic extinction event occurred 200 million years ago and is one of the major
extinction events of the
Phanerozoic eon, profoundly affecting life on land and in the oceans. Twenty percent of all marine families and all large
Crurotarsi (non-dinosaurian
archosaurs), some remaining
therapsids, and many of the large
amphibians were wiped out. At least half of the species now known to have been living on Earth at that time went extinct. This event opened an
ecological niche allowing the
dinosaurs to assume the dominant roles in the
Jurassic period. Non-avian dinosaur fossils are not found later than the K–T boundary, except for a few controversial exceptions. Many other groups of animals and plants, including
mosasaurs,
plesiosaurs,
pterosaurs, and some
invertebrates, also became extinct at the K–T boundary. The event marks the end of the
Mesozoic Era, and the beginning of the
Cenozoic Era.
Most of the extinctions occurred in a relatively short time because extensive weather changes reduced
photosynthesis, thereby decreasing the amount of plant material available to
herbivorous animals. This change in food supply caused a massive disruption in Earth's ecology.
Despite the severity of the K–T extinction event, there was significant variability in the rate of extinction of different classes of organisms. Organisms which depended on
photosynthesis became extinct or suffered heavy losses due to reduced
sunlight. Photosynthesizing organisms, from
plankton (for example
coccolithophorids) to land
plants, formed the primary part of the food chain in the late Cretaceous.
Herbivorous animals, which depended on plants and plankton as their food, died out as their food sources became scarce; consequently, top
predators such as
Tyrannosaurus rex also began dying.
Animals which built
calcium carbonate shells (for example, coccolithophorids along with many groups of
molluscs, including
ammonites,
rudists,
fresh water snails and
mussels), as well as organisms whose
food chain depended on these
calcium carbonate shell builders, became extinct or suffered heavy losses. For example, it's thought that ammonites were the principal food of
mosasaurs, a group of giant marine reptiles that became extinct at the boundary.
Most omnivores, insectivores and
carrion-eaters appear to have survived quite well. At the end of the Cretaceous there seem to have been no purely herbivorous or carnivorous mammals. Many mammals, and the birds which survived the extinction, fed on
insects,
larvae,
worms, snails, etc., which in turn fed on dead plant matter. They may have survived the collapse of plant-based food chains because they lived in "
detritus-based" food chains.
In
stream communities few groups of animals became extinct. Stream communities tend to rely less on food from living plants and more on detritus that washes in from land. This may have buffered them from extinction. Similar, but more complex patterns have been found in the oceans. Extinction was more severe among animals living in the
water column, than among animals living on or in the sea floor. Animals in the water column are almost entirely dependent on
primary production from living phytoplankton, while many animals living on or in the
ocean floor feed on detritus or can switch to detritus feeding.
The largest air-breathing survivors,
crocodilians and
champsosaurs, were semi-aquatic. Modern crocodilians can live as scavengers and can survive for months without food. Modern crocodilian young are small, grow slowly, and feed largely on invertebrates and dead organisms or fragments of organisms for their first few years. This has been linked to crocodilian survival at the end of the Cretaceous. However, since most extinctions are likely to go undocumented, scientists estimate that during the last century, between 20,000 and two million species have become extinct, but the precise total can't be determined more accurately within the limits of present knowledge. Up to 140,000 species per year (based on
Species-area theory) may be the present rate of extinction based upon upper bound estimating.
In broad usage, the Holocene extinction event includes the notable disappearance of large
mammals, known as
megafauna, by the end of the
last ice age 9,000 to 13,000 years ago. Such disappearances have been considered as either a response to climate change, a result of the
proliferation of
modern humans, or both. These extinctions, occurring near the
Pleistocene / Holocene boundary, are sometimes referred to as the
Pleistocene Extinction Event or Ice Age extinction event. However the Holocene extinction event continues through the events of the past several millennia and includes the present time.
The observed rate of extinction has accelerated dramatically in the last 50 years, to a pace greater than the rate seen during the Big Five. There is no general agreement on whether to consider more recent extinctions as a distinct event or merely part of a single escalating process. Only during these most recent parts of the extinction have plants also suffered large losses. Overall, the Holocene extinction event is most significantly characterised by the presence of man-made driving factors and its very short
geological timescale (tens to thousands of years) compared to most other extinction events.
Significantly, the rate of species extinctions at present is estimated at 100 to 1000 times "background" or average extinction rates in the
evolutionary time scale of planet
Earth.
Three domain systems
Prokaryote
It is generally accepted that the
first living cells were some form of prokaryote and may have developed out of
protobionts. Fossilized prokaryotes approximately 3.5 billion years old have been discovered, and prokaryotes are the most successful and abundant organism even today. In contrast the eukaryote only appeared between approximately 1.7 and 2.2 billion years ago. While Earth is the only known place in the universe where life exist, some have suggested structures within a Martian
meteorite should be interpreted as fossil prokaryotes; this is open to considerable debate and skepticism.
Prokaryotes diversified greatly throughout their long existence. The metabolism of prokaryotes is far more varied than that of
eukaryotes, leading to many highly distinct types of prokaryotes. For example, in addition to using
photosynthesis or organic compounds for energy like eukaryotes do, prokaryotes may obtain energy from inorganic chemicals such as
hydrogen sulfide.
Eukaryote
The origin of the eukaryotic cell was a milestone in the evolution of life, since they include all complex cells and almost all multi-cellular organisms. The timing of this series of events is hard to determine; Knoll (1992) suggests they developed approximately 1.6 to 2.1 billion years ago. Fossils that are clearly related to modern groups start appearing around 1.2 billion years ago, in the form of a
red alga.
rRNA trees constructed during the 1980s and 1990s left most eukaryotes in an unresolved "crown" group (not technically a true
crown), which was usually divided by the form of the mitochondrial cristae. The few groups that lack mitochondria branched separately and so the absence was believed to be primitive, but this is now considered an artifact of
long branch attraction and they're known to have lost them secondarily.
Trees based on
actin and other molecules have painted a different and more complete picture. Most eukaryotes are now included in several supergroups:
| Opisthokonts |
Animals, fungi, choanoflagellates, etc. |
| Amoebozoa |
Most lobose amoebae and slime moulds |
| Rhizaria |
Foraminifera, Radiolaria, and various other amoeboid protozoa |
| Excavates |
Various flagellate protozoa |
| Primoplantae (or Archaeplastida) |
Land plants, green algae, red algae, and glaucophytes |
| Chromists |
Brown algae, diatoms, water molds, etc. |
| Alveolates |
Ciliates, Apicomplexa, dinoflagellates, etc. |
}} }}
Modern cladogram of Eukarya
Several authorities recognize two larger clades, the
unikonts and the
bikonts, the unikonts deriving from an ancestral uniflagellar organism, and the bikonts deriving from an ancestral biflagellate. In this system, the opisthokonts and amoebozoans are considered unikonts, and the rest are considered bikonts. The chromists and alveolates may be part of a larger group that's ancestrally photosynthetic, called the
chromalveolates, but this remains contentious. Some small protist groups have not been related to any of these supergroups, in particular the
centrohelids.
Eukaryotes are closely related to
Archaea, at least in terms of nuclear DNA and genetic machinery, and are placed by some, along with the Archaea, in the clade
Neomura. In other respects, such as membrane composition, they're similar to
eubacteria. Three main explanations for this have been proposed:
Eukaryotes resulted from the complete fusion of two or more cells, the cytoplasm forming from a eubacterium and the nucleus from an archaeon (alternatively a virus).
Eukaryotes developed from Archaea, and acquired their eubacterial characteristics from the proto-mitochondrion.
Eukaryotes and Archaea developed separately from a modified eubacterium.
The final hypothesis is currently the most accepted.
The origin of the endomembrane system and mitochondria are also disputed. The phagotrophic hypothesis states the membranes originated with the development of endocytosis and later specialized; mitochondria were acquired by ingestion, like plastids. The syntrophic hypothesis states that the proto-eukaryote relied on the proto-mitochondrion for food, and so ultimately grew to surround it; the membranes originate later, in part thanks to mitochondrial genes (the hydrogen hypothesis is one particular version).
Archaea
The Archaea are a major group of microorganisms. Archaea are similar to other prokaryotes in most aspects of cell structure and metabolism. However, their genetic transcription and translation—the two central processes in molecular biology—do not show many typical bacterial features, and are in many aspects similar to those of eukaryotes. For instance, archaean translation uses eukaryotic-like initiation and elongation factors, and their transcription involves TATA Binding Proteins and TFIIB as in eukaryotes. Many archaeal tRNA and rRNA genes harbor unique archaeal introns which are neither like eukaryotic introns, nor like bacterial (type I and type II etc which can "home") introns.
Archaea were identified in 1977 by Carl Woese and George E. Fox as being a separate branch based on their separation from other prokaryotes on 16S rRNA phylogenetic trees. These two groups were originally named the Archaebacteria and Eubacteria, treated as kingdoms or subkingdoms, which Woese and Fox termed Urkingdoms. Woese argued that they represented fundamentally different branches of living things. He later renamed the groups Archaea and Bacteria to emphasize this, and argued that together with Eukarya they compose three Domains of living organisms.
The Archaea shouldn't be confused with the geological term Archean eon, also known as the Archeozoic era. This refers to the primordial period of Earth history when Archaea and Bacteria were the only cellular organisms living on the planet. Probable fossils of these microbes have been dated to almost 3.5 billion years ago.
Evolution of sex
The evolution of sex is a major puzzle. The first fossilized evidence of sexually reproducing organisms is from eukaryotes of the Stenian period, about 1.2 to 1 billion years ago with DNA forming 3.5 to 4.6 billion years. Sexual reproduction is the primary method of reproduction for the vast majority of visible organisms, including almost all animals and plants. Bacterial conjugation, the transfer of DNA between two bacteria, is often mistakenly confused with sexual reproduction, because the mechanics are similar.
A major question is why sexual reproduction persists when parthenogenesis appears in some ways to be a superior form of reproduction. Contemporary evolutionary thought proposes some explanations. It may be due to selection pressure on the clade itself—the ability for a population to radiate more rapidly due to a changing environment through sexual recombination than parthenogenesis allows. Alternatively, sexual reproduction may allow for the 'ratcheting' of evolutionary speed as one clade competes with another for a limited resource.
Organisms need to replicate their genetic material in an efficient and reliable manner. The necessity to repair genetic damage is one of the leading theories explaining the origin of sexual reproduction. Diploid individuals can repair a mutated section of its DNA via homologous recombination, since there are two copies of the gene in the cell and one copy is presumed to be undamaged. A mutation in an haploid individual, on the other hand, is more likely to become resident, as the DNA repair machinery has no way of knowing what the original undamaged sequence was. The most primitive form of sex may have been one organism with damaged DNA replicating an undamaged strand from a similar organism in order to repair itself.
Another theory is that sexual reproduction originated from selfish parasitic genetic elements that exchange genetic material (that is: copies of their own genome) for their transmission and propagation. In some organisms, sexual reproduction has been shown to enhance the spread of parasitic genetic elements (for example yeast, filamentous fungi). Bacterial conjugation, a form of genetic exchange that some sources describe as sex, isn't a form of reproduction. However, it does support the selfish genetic element theory, as it's propagated through such a "selfish gene", the F-plasmid.
A comprehensive origin of sex as vaccination theory proposes that eukaryan sex-as-syngamy (fusion sex) arose from prokaryan unilateral sex-as-infection when infected hosts began swapping nuclearized genomes containing coevolved, vertically transmitted symbionts that provided protection against horizontal superinfection by more virulent symbionts. Sex-as-meiosis (fission sex) then evolved as a host strategy to uncouple (and thereby emasculate) the acquired symbiont genomes.
External results
Click here for more details on Evolutionary History Of Life
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://evolutionary_history_of_life.totallyexplained.com">Evolutionary history of life Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
We see you're using Internet Explorer. Try Firefox, we think you'll like it better.
· Firefox blocks pop-up windows.
· It stops viruses and spyware.
· It keeps Microsoft from controlling the future of the internet.
Click the button on the right to download Firefox. It's free.